Pragatishil Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1846 of 2016 ====================================================== Pragatishil Adarsh Sahakari Grih Nirman Samiti Limited having its office At Shashtri Nagar, Road No. 4, P.S. - Kashim Bazar, Munger through its Chairman, Krishna Mohan Prasad Sinha, Son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad, Resident of Nirmala Bhawa, Shashtrinagar, P.S. - Kashim Bazar, Munger .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sri Amrit Lal Meena, the Secretary, Cooperative Department Government of Bihar, Patna
3. Sri Ajay Kumar Choubey, the Registrar, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. Sri Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, the District Magistrate, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 11-05-2016 Heard Mr. Rajiv Kumar Verma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Although the petitioner complains of violation by the respondents of the judgment and order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C.No.16760 of 2012 inter alia on grounds that the follow up steps is not being taken by the respondents as a consequence of the quashing of the liquidation proceedings but in the nature of the judgment and order so passed in the writ petition, in my opinion, in absence of any direction in this regard by the writ Court, no case of contempt is made out for in case the authorities concerned are not taking steps as they are obliged to do so in consequence of the quashing of the liquidation proceedings viz appointment of
Patna High Court MJC No.1846 of 2016 (2) dt.11-05-2016 2/2 Arbitrator etc. as stated by the petitioner, that may give a cause of action for the petitioner to maintain a writ petition but it certainly does not amount to a violation of the order passed in the writ petition in absence of any such direction.
In the circumstances discussed, the contempt application is disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U