Virendra Kumar Vidyarthi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4522 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Virendra Kumar Vidyarthi Son of Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village - Dakshini Chak, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna 2.

Surpramila Devi, Wife of Vikash Singh, resident of village - Rupas Kamra Par, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna 3.

Sharda Devi, Wife of Binod Prasad Singh, resident of village - Jamalpur, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna 4.

Jaimanti Devi, Wife of Nago Sao, resident of village - Budhra, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna 5.

Geeta Devi, Wife of Ram Ratan Sao, resident of village - Bujurg Tola, Sabnima, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate - Cum - District Election Officer Panchayat, Patna 3.

The Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Block Development Officer - Cum - Executive Officer, Athmalgola, District - Patna 5.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Patna 6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Barh 7.

Sushma Devi Pramukh, Wife of Ramanuj Singh, resident of Chedisingh Tola, Ram Nagar, Karari Kachahar, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna 8.

Dharmendra Kumar Up - Pramukh , Son of Ramdev Yadav, resident of West Sabnima, P.S. Athmalgola, District - Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Alok-SC7 For the S.E.C.

:

Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, learned counsel for the State Election Commission.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with

Patna High Court CWJC No.4522 of 2017(2) dt.27-02-2023 2/2 passage of time, the writ application has become infructuous and, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U