Sunita Devi v. The Central Bank Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7917 of 2016 =========================================================== Sunita Devi, W/o Stayendra Prasad, R/o Vill & P.O. Mohanpur, P.S. Muffasil, District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Central Bank of India, through its Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Saharsa.
2. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Begusarai Branch, Asha Palace, Town Hall, Kali Asthan, Begusarai.
3. The Presiding Officer, Central Bank of India, Debt Recovery Tribunal Patna, Ashiana Digha Road, Karpuri Sadar 5th Floor, Patna
4. The Recovery Officer, Central Bank of India, DRT, Patna, Ashiana Digha Road, Karpuri Sadar, 5th Floor, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-07-2016 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 08.09.2015 passed in O.A. No. 200 of 2014 by learned Presiding Officer, Bihar, Patna by which learned Presiding Officer has ordered the petitioner to pay debt amount with interest amounting to Rs. 13,22,346/- together with pendent lite and future interest at contractual rate of interest from 30.08.2014 till realization of the entire sum due and recoverable with cost and for connected reliefs.
2. At the very outset, this Court takes note that the petitioner has adequate remedy against the impugned order of
Patna High Court CWJC No.7917 of 2016 dt.13-07-2016 2/2 the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna dated 08.09.2015 before the appellate forum for redressal of her grievances.
3. In the above view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as may be available to her in accordance with law.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 18.07.2016 Transmission Date N/A