Ganesh Prasad @ Ganesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.575 of 2012 ====================================================== Ganesh Prasad @ Ganesh Prasad Gupta@ Ganesh Prasad Sondik son of Late Tapsi Prasad Gupta @ Late Tapsi Prasad Sondik@ Late Tapsi Sao, resident of Village- Jalwan, P.O.- Ghatraich, P.S. Madanpur, DistrictAurangabad, at present residing at Shahpur, Near Narendra Talkies Cinema, Town P.S. Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Board of Revenue, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna
2. District Magistrate, Aurangabad
3. District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad
4. Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Authorised Officer N.H.2,Aurangabad
5. Circle Officer, Aurangabad
6. Bibhishan Prasad son of Late Tapsi Prasad, resident of Village-Jalwan, Gram Panchayat -Ghatraine, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad
7. Ram Charitra Prasad son of Late Tapsi Prasad, resident of VillageJalwan, Gram Panchayat -Ghatraine, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad
8. Ram Prasad son of Late Tapsi Prasad, resident of Village-Jalwan, Gram Panchayat -Ghatraine, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad
9. Shanti Devi D/O Unknown, resident of Village- Kathua, P.S. Moffasil, Aurangabad
10. Vijay Kumar Singh S/O Unknown, resident of Village- Kathua, P.S. Moffasil, Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER --------------- 10-09-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition. Learned AC to learned Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 5, submits that the present writ petition at this stage is pre-mature and is liable to be dismissed on that ground alone.
Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Tahir/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U