Shashi Ranjan Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1812 of 2014 In LPA 611 of 2014 ====================================================== Shashi Ranjan Kumar, S/o Sri Yadolal Prasad, resident of Village Beltharva, P.S. Pipra Kothi, District East Champaran (Sadar Mothihari). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.

2. The Assistant Director (FB-1), FHQ, SSB, New Delhi-66.

3. The Assistant Director (Vigilance) PHQ, SSB, New Delhi.

4. The Staff Officer (Admn.), Frontier Hqr, SSB, Arpan, New Baily Road, Danapur, Patna.

5. The Accounts/QM Branch/Insp/HQ/M.I. Room/SRC, New Delhi.

6. The Inspectors (H. Qrs.), S.S.B., New Delhi-66.

7. The CRC Cell, 29th Bn. SSB Khaprail, P.O. Matigara, District Darjeeling (W.B.).

8. The F.O. (Clerk/SRC 29th Battalion Khaprail, P.O. New Chunta, District Darjeeling (W.B.).

9. The Commandant, 29th Battalion, SSB Khaprail, District Darjeeling (W.B.).

10. The Deputy Commandant, Office of the Commandant, 29th Battalion SSB, Khaprail, District Darjeeling (W.B.).

11. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran.

12. The State of Bihar.

13. The Headmaster, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Khiri, Mushar Toli, Chakia, East Champaran (Motihari).

.... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 11-08-2015 I.A. No. 6503 of 2015 in M.J.C. No. 1812 of 2014 has been filed for amendment in paragraph no. 1 of the restoration application so as to seek restoration of I.A. No. 3057 of 2014 filed in L.P.A. No. 611 of 2014 also.

Patna High Court MJC No.1812 of 2014 (4) dt.11-08-2015 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence the said relief could not be mentioned in paragraph no. 1 of the restoration application, although in the prayer portion of the restoration application prayer was made for restoration of the said I.A. No. 3057 of 2014 also.

In the facts and circumstances, prayer for amendment is allowed. I.A. No. 6503 of 2015 is, accordingly, disposed of. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the State and the Central Government, I.A. No. 3057 of 2014 as also L.P.A. No. 611 of 2014 are directed to be restored to their respective original files. The restoration application is, accordingly, allowed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U