Taro Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43823 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2018 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Taro Mahto Son of Late Chamari Mahto, resident of Village- Begrajpur, Police Station- Pakribarawan, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque, APP 159 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 24.05.2018 in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 123/2018 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant and the petitioner are brothers and there was a dispute with regard to the partition of land. There was some altercation, but, now the parties have compromised the matter. It is further submitted that the injuries suffered were scratches and bruises and have been found to be simple in nature.

Considering the relationship and enmity between the parties, and the injuries were found to be simple in nature, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43823 of 2018(2) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 123/2018 to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar Abinash, Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class, Nawada on the following conditions.

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably father, mother, brother, sister of petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/uma/- U