Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47979 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikaram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar @ Kailu Yadav S/o Ramotar Yadav Resident of Village- Lakhaua, P.S- Wazirganj, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50984 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Yadav Son of Nirmal Yadav Resident of Village- Sabalchak, P.S.- Tankuppain the District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47979 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50984 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 386, 435, 379 of the IPC under Sections 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 38, 40 of UAP Act and Sections 17 of C.L.A, Act.
3. As per prosecution case, about 20 miscreants
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 attacked the construction site of the company of the informant which was engaged in construction of a rail bridge and set on fire a number of equipments including the truck tippers, Excavator, Hydra, Sumo vehicle, a motorcycle and Tata P & H Crane. The miscreants also threatened the employees present there at the gunpoint and assaulted them and took away their mobile phones and cash amounting to Rs.50,000/- from individual workers. The name of the petitioners transpired as one of the miscreants during investigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners were not arrested at the spot and nothing was recovered from their possession. Their names have figured only in the confessional statement of co-accused Kamlesh Ram @ Kamlesh Khar @ Kamlesh Chandravanshi. He has further submitted that other co-accused persons have been granted bail.
5. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, are directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 following conditions that the petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.
6. Before accepting the bail bond, the learned court below shall verify whether any incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner or not. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T