Manendra Jha @ Manendra Kumar Jha @ Manindra Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43802 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -205 Year- 2018 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ======================================================
1. MANENDRA JHA @ MANENDRA KUMAR JHA @ MANINDRA KUMAR JHA Son of Yugal Jha Resident of Village- Aminpur, P.S. Amarpur, District Banka.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case No.205 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448/34, 354(A) and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he entered inside the house of the informant and took Rs.12,000/- kept beneath the pillow and when he caught the hand of the informant she raised alarm and on her alarm her daughter-in-law also woke up and both tried to catch the petitioner.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to rivalry regarding settlement of sand hat the present case has been lodged against the petitioner. He has got no criminal
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43802 of 2018 (2) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in Amarpur P.S. Case No.205 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further conditions are that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and further condition is that he has to co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the police, otherwise the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U