Sujeet Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1134 of 2019 Arising out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== SUJEET KUMAR SINGH, aged about 42 years, Male, Son of Sri Raghuvansh Narain Singh, Resident of Village - Vishunpur Tara, P.S.- Madhuban, Distt - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran. 4.

The Officer- In- Charge, Madhuban Police Station, Distt - East Champaran. 5.

Rinku Das, Son of Vinod Das 6.

Chandra Bhushan Kumar, Son of Mishrilal Sah, 7.

Vinod Das Son of Ghutak Das 8.

Gyanti Devi Wife of Rinku Das 9.

Mishri Lal Sah, Son of Late Bholi Sah 10.

Kunti Devi Wife of Mishri Lal Sah, Respondent No. 5 to 10 Resident of Village + P.O. and P.S.- Madhuban, Distt - East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rana Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, A.C. to A.G.

For Respondent Nos. 5, 7,8:

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Shri Abhishek Kumar for the Respondent Nos. 5,7 and 8.

A certified copy of the order dated 03.08.2019 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 4th, East Champaran,

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1134 of 2019(3) dt.19-08-2019 2/2 Motihari has been placed before us along with the deposition of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The same is kept on record. Having perused the same and the fact that the victim has been recovered and she has voluntarily opted to accompany her parents, as recorded in the order of the Magistrate, and she has made this statement also in the presence of her parents before us, we see no reason to continue with this Habeas Corpus Petition, which is accordingly consigned to records. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U