Amar Bhushan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1839 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17259 of 2015 ====================================================== Amar Bhushan Prakash S/o- Sri Prakash Singh, R/o- Sharda Nagar, Rosera Samastipur, District- Samastipur, Pin-848210. ... ... Appellant
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Secretary & State Commissioner (Disabilities), Office of the State Commissioner Disability, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Secretary and State Commissioner Disabilities, Office of the State Commissioner Disability, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Additional Commissioner Disabilities, Office of the State Commissioner Disability, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.
The Director, Social Security and Disability, Social Welfare Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Director Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
7.
The Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, Bihar, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 8.
The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna, through its Secretary. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant :
Mr.Avanindra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey -Aag15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 This memorandum of appeal is directed against the order dated 06.04.2017 passed in CWJC No. 17259 of 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition has been dismissed.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1839 of 2017(5) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal reserving liberty to file a review petition in accordance with law.
Prayer allowed.
The period for which the appellant has been pursuing the present appeal shall not be counted for the purposes of limitation.
We clarify that we have not dealt with the issue on merits.
The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U