Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11866 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.
Shanti Devi W/o Basant Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Pachauri, P.O. Pachauri, P.S. Deepnagar, District- Nalanda.
2.
Sanjiv Kumar, Son of Late Mahadeo Lal @ Mahadeo Sao, Resident of Village- Pachauri, P.O. Pachauri, P.S. Deepnagar, District- Nalanda. 3.
Gita Devi, W/o Shiv Kumar Ram, Resident of Village- Pachauri, P.O. Pachauri, P.S. Deepnagar, District- Nalanda.
4.
Rajiv Kumar, Son of Late Mahadeo Lal @ Mahadeo Sao, Resident of Village- Pachauri, P.O. Pachauri, P.S,. Deepnagar, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar.
2.
The District Magistrate, Nalanda.
3.
The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. 4.
The Block Development Officer, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. 5.
The Circle Officer, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.
6.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Pachauri, Prakhand Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus Commanding and directing the respondents to stop the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan over the Raiyati/Purchase land of the petitioners i.e. Khata No.141 Khesra
Patna High Court CWJC No.11866 of 2025(4) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 No.2433 Area 70 decimals situated under Mauza-Pachauri Thana No.92 Block- Bihar Sharif, District -Nalanda.
ii. For a direction to respondents to construct Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan over the land i.e. Khata No.313 Khesra No.2492 Area 11.90 Acre of Mauza Pachauri as per resolution passed by the Gram Sabha of Gram Panchayat Raj Pachauri in its meeting dated 02.10.2023.
iii. For grant of any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioners are found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.
3. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U