Ruplal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48526 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ruplal Kumar Son of America Ray @ America Ray Resident of Village - Madhopur Hajari, P.S.- Sahebganj, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
While the informant was going to deposit the collection amount of Rs. 1,03,800/- to the bank, three miscreants came on a motorcycle without having registration number, surrounded the informant and on the point of gun snatched away the aforesaid amount.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that name of petitioner has come during course of investigation. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2019 having clean antecedent. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48526 of 2019(3) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2019 subject to conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T