Dinesh Dutt Trivedi @ Dwivedi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22358 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2016 Thana -SALAIYA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Dinesh Dutt Trivedi @ Dwivedi, son of Radha Krishan Trivedi, resident of village + P.O. and P.S. Goh, District - Aurangabad (Bihar).
2. Vijay Thakur, son of Bhuneshwar Thakur, resident of village - Koshidhara, Police Station - Nabinagar, District - Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlendra Pd. Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 20-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State. The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 188, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that both the Petitioners claim to have deposited the required papers in time and they have fair antecedents, let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Salaiya P.S. Case No. 05 of 2016, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22358 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016 2/2 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail.
(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.