← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62078/2021bail granted

Bishnu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-09Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62078 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2021 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== BISHNU PASWAN SON OF BIRJE @ BIRJAN PASWAN @ BRIJ NANDAN PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- BELSAR, P.S.- NOORSARAI, DISTRICT- NALANDA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 181 of 2021 registered under Sections 363, 420, 419, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and have antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that he was sitting in an Alto car and his son sat in a Maruti car from Biharsharif Bus stand, further on seeing the police the Maruti Car sped and fled away while the Alto Car in which the informant was sitting was stopped and the police recognized the driver as Lallu Paswan, a cheat, who disclosed that informant's son was taken by Vishnu and his brother Subodh on a Maruti Car, it is next alleged that the accused dropped his son after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62078 of 2021(3) dt.09-05-2022 2/2 snatching Rs. 5000/- and a mobile. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for purposes of bail that it was a failed attempt to commit abduction. It is also submitted that the informant subsequently has filed an affidavit in the learned court below wherein he has specifically stated that no such occurrence has ever taken place.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and the informant subsequently has filed an affidavit negating the prosecution case, let the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 181 of 2021, with a condition that one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner Birje @ Birjan Paswan @ Brij Nandan Paswan. (Satyavrat Verma, J) ved/- U T