← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51419/2022allowed

Kaleshwar Das @ Kaleshwar Mochi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51419 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2022 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

KALESHWAR DAS @ KALESHWAR MOCHI SON OF SARJUG DAS R/O VILLAGE- NADWAN, P.S.- BARH, DISTRICT- PATNA 2.

SANOJ DAS SON OF KALESHWAR DAS @ KALESHWAR MOCHI R/O VILLAGE- NADWAN, P.S.- BARH, DISTRICT- PATNA 3.

SANJEEV DAS SON OF KALESHWAR DAS @ KALESHWAR MOCHI R/O VILLAGE- NADWAN, P.S.- BARH, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51419 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He further submits that injuries found upon the victim are simple in nature. He submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 287/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U