Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50526/2026bail granted

Shyam Sundar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50526 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2026 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shyam Sundar Singh Son of Manmohan Singh Resident of Village- Pathrahi, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bhairavsthan P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 432 liters liquor was recovered from Scorpio Car and one Swift Car was also seized from the place of occurrence. The petitioner was arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50526 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 further submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the Scorpio Car from which recovery had been made. He was the driver of the Swift Car from which there had been no recovery. The petitioner has falsely been implicated by the police due to ulterior motive. The petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhairavsthan P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) sukriti/- U T