Nago Pandit @ Nageshwar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8022 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2020 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

NAGO PANDIT @ NAGESHWAR PANDIT Son of Late Vashudev Pandit Resident of Village - Gaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, Dist.- Purnia. 2.

Mithu Pandit @ Mithu Kumar Son of Nago Pandit Resident of Village - Gaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, Dist.- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Shankar Choubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 65 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, while the husband and father-in-law of the informant were coming to their residence,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8022 of 2021(2) dt.08-12-2021 2/3 accused persons including the Petitioners assaulted them by means of iron rod to the husband of the informand resulting into head injury and he became unconscious. When the crime was objected by his father-in-law, he was also assaulted by them. They also snatched a gold chain of the informant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. Injury received by the husband and father-in-law of the informant are simple in nature which reveals from the injury report annexed as Annexure-2 to the petition.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 65 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnia subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8022 of 2021(2) dt.08-12-2021 3/3 to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U