Mangal Chaupal @ Resham Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45340 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2018 Thana- SAKATPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MANGAL CHAUPAL @ RESHAM CHAUPAL S/o Late Khubi Chaupal, R/o Vill.- Nadiyami, P.S.- Sakatpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP 73 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 02.06.2018 in connection with G.O. Case No. 6 of 2018 arising out of Sakatpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2018 registered under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries are of small quantity and not from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with G.O. Case No. 6 of 2018 arising out of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45340 of 2018(2) dt.06-08-2018 2/2 Sakatpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Darbhanga, on the following conditions.

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably mother, brother, sister of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T