Saroj Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49986 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- SANICHARI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Saroj Ram Son of Late Bahadur Ram Resident of Village - Basopati, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Shanichari, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shanichari P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner has committed murder of his mother due to some disagreement in between them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that name of the petitioner has transpired in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49986 of 2025(3) dt.14-10-2025 2/2 case only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is son of the deceased. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that as per post-mortem report, it appears that the doctor has opined the cause of death due to asphyxia as a result of hanging which shows that the deceased has committed suicide. The petitioner is in custody since 03.05.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Shanichari P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T