Md. Rumman Firdausi @ Rumman Firdausi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9887 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9887 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2010 Thana -BAHERA District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Md. Rumman Firdausi @ Rumman Firdausi son of late Ghazi Sikandar resident of Mohalla Hashmi Mohalla Bara Bazar PS Madhubani Dist. Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chitranjan Pd.Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP For the informant Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 12.03.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahera P.S. Case no. 100/2010 registered under sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

Petitioner was Block Programme officer and the accusation against him is that he defalcated government money which had been allotted for execution of Manrega schemes in the year 2008-09 and 2009-10.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no one raised objection regarding execution of the aforesaid schemes but informant filed complaint case with mala fide intention and on the basis of complaint case, present case has been registered. Learned counsel appearing for the informant points out

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9887 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015 that a team of the Central Government came and enquired into execution of schemes and found that schemes were not executed in proper way and huge amount was misappropriated. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga in Bahera P.S. Case no. 100/2010 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T