← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58599/2024dismissed

Md. Irshad Mansoori @ Md. Irshad @ Irshad Mansoori @ Kuswa v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58599 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2023 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Irshad Mansoori @ Md. Irshad @ Irshad Mansoori @ Kuswa Son of Md. Naushad R/O Siranda, P.s.- Pranpur, Dist.- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 173 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the F.I.R, the petitioner is assailant of the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eyewitness of the occurrence. Petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the trial is on the verge of the conclusion.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58599 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2

6. In the trial, out of five charge-sheeted witnesses, three witnesses have been examined including the doctor.

7. Considering the fact that the trial is on the verge of conclusion, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

8. As the trial is continuing, it is expected that it is not unnecessarily delayed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T