Patna High CourtCWJC/4385/2015disposed

Md. Tajuddin Ansari @ Md. Tajuddin Ahmad v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS

2015-07-03Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.4385 of 2015 (3) dt.03-07-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4385 of 2015 ====================================================== Md. Tajuddin Ansari @ Md. Tajuddin Ahmad son of Late Md. Jamaluddin resident of Mohalla- Saguna Danapur, Post- Danapur Cantt, Police Station Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., Patna, through its Managing Director having office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey road, Police Station- Kotwali, district- Patna.

2. Executive Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Danapur Division, having Office at Bailey road, near Ishan international School, Police Station - Rupashpur, District- Patna.

3. Junior Electrical Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Danapur Division, having Office at RPS More Bailey road Danapur, Police Station - Rupashpur, District- Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2015 The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents for providing him with a domestic electrical connection at his residence at Mohalla-Saguna, Danapur in the District of Patna.

Mr. Vikash Kumar has appeared for the petitioner while the respondent Holding / Distribution Company is represented by Mr. Prakash Kumar and learned counsel jointly submit that following the order of this Court on 21.5.2015 the petitioner has supplied the respondents with documents relatable

Patna High Court CWJC No.4385 of 2015 (3) dt.03-07-2015 to share holding in the house in question and which is being verified and no sooner it stands confirmed that the electrical connection would be provided to him shortly thereafter. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits to the position and submits that he has been assured as such. In the circumstances discussed where the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed upon by the respondents and who are acting in furtherance thereof, there is no reason to keep the writ petition pending and which is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U