Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50921/2018bail granted

Gauri Shanker Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-03Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50921 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Gauri Shanker Rai, Son of Late Rajnandan Rai, Resident of VillageChakmahila, P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in C2-01 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 200 grams of ganja.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 28.06.2017.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Sessions

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50921 of 2018(2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with C2 Case No. C2/01/2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U