Satyam Kumar Singh @Hasmukh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55735 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-623 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== SATYAM KUMAR SINGH @HASMUKH SON OF DHARMENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AMRI, PS- MUFFASIL, DISTT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priya Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 337, 338, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, while the informant was returning from his friend's house, in the meantime, the accused persons including the petitioner came and started assaulting him by means of iron rod due to which he sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the co-accused namely, Bittu Singh fired bullet in his left leg.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55735 of 2023(2) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 committed no offence. There is no specific allegation of firing against the petitioner rather the specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Bittu Singh. He submitted that the injury report does not show any gun shot injury as alleged in the FIR. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 21.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64060 of 2022. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 623 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U