Pushpa Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49979 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Pushpa Devi W/o- Suraj Paswan Village- Chanhat PS- Haspura DistrictAurangabad Bihar 2.
Fulwanti Devi W/o- Nanheshwar Paswan Village- Chanhat PS- Haspura District- Aurangabad Bihar 3.
Meri Devi W/o- Santosh Paswan Village- Chanhat PS- Haspura DistrictAurangabad Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Rupa Kumari, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP Mr. Nitee Ranjan, Adv Ms. Manisha Kumari, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 103(1), 76 and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that she had gone to attend nature's call, when Randhir and Ranjan came and started acting
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49979 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/3 inappropriately, on alarm, father-in-law and cousin father-in-law of the informant came, when accused persons fled, further her father-in-law, Ramshakal, went to the house of the accused along with some people when Randhir assaulted him by sword causing injury on head, further Ranjan assaulted Chandradeep with lathi, danda and sword causing injury, thereafter the accused Vikash assaulted Chandradeep and Suresh by lathi, danda and sword, thereafter police was informed and the injured were taken to hospital but Chandradeep died.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioners. It is also submitted that Bijanti Devi @ Biranti Dev had approached this court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 49576 of 2025 and the same was allowed by a learned Co-ordinate Bench by an order dated 6-8-2025.
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49979 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T