Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57367/2024bail rejected

Angad Ray @ Angad Kumar @ Angad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57367 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Angad Ray @ Angad Kumar @ Angad Yadav S/O Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav R/O Village- Sharkar Sharaiya, P.S- Turkauliya, Dist.- East Chamapran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 332 of 2023 dated 28.04.2023, lodged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

3. As per the prosecution story, FIR has been lodged against six unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have committed loot from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57367 of 2024(3) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to confessional statement of the coaccused.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. It is directed to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today. In case, the petitioner surrendered within four weeks, then the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his surrender-cum-bail application on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T