← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61340/2021bail rejected

Md. Shahid v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61340 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2020 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shahid Son Of Late Abdul Rashid R/O Village- Kasai Mohalla Puraini, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Md. Amzad Son Of Md. Shahid R/O Village- Kasai Mohalla Puraini, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners pray for bail in a case registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the F.I.R., some miscreants on the point of pistol snatched bag from the informant containing therein cash of Rs. 1,69,700/-, a blanket and Aadhar Card of the informant. Name of the petitioners transpired during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused. It is submitted that no looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners and till date, they have not been put on T.I.Parade. Petitioners are in custody since 14.04.2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61340 of 2021(3) dt.04-04-2022 2/2 However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that on the confessional statement of coaccused, stolen money of Rs. 1,04,200/-, two country-made pistol and six cartridges have been recovered from the house of petitioners and during course of investigation, in the restatement, the informant has stated that he had identified petitioners at the place of occurrence, but due to fear, he did not disclose their name in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and same is, accordingly, rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T