Jabina Perween v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.876 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5626 of 2014 ====================================================== Jabina Perween D/o Makbool Ahmad, Wife of Md. Nayeem, Resident of Village-Belsand Balua Tola, P.S. Barauli, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development 2.

Sri Rahul, The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 3.

The Parkhand Shikshak Niyojan Samiti, Gopalganj through Sri Kumar Prashant, Block Development Offic 4.

Sri Kumar Prashant the Block development Officer, Barauli Block, DistrictGopalganj 5.

Smt. Pushpa Kiran, the Pramukh, Brauli, District-Gopalganj. 6.

Sri Suman Kumar Singh, the Block Education Officer, Barauli, Gopalganj 7.

Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, Member, the Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj.

8.

Sri Dilip Mahto the Headmaster, Utkrmit Madhya Vidyalay, Sikatiya BlockBarauli, District-Gopalganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey- Aag15 Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to Aag- 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of order dated 01.03.2016 passed in CWJC No. 5626 of 2014, wherein, this Court has passed the order to the effect that the issue raised by the petitioner can also be examined by the Tribunal exercising jurisdiction in this regard as if such an application is filed by the petitioner, the concerned Tribunal will surely look into the conduct of the authorities and the grievances

Patna High Court MJC No.876 of 2017(13) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 raised therein within a reasonable time frame.

2. No case of contempt has been made out in the light of the nature of the order that has been passed in the writ petition.

3. In view of the above, this contempt application stands closed and disposed off.

(Nani Tagia, J) Siddharth Sagar/- U