← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8764/2016disposed

Suresh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8764 of 2016 ====================================================== Suresh Prasad Yadav, S/o Sri Bhola Singh, resident of Naya Tola, Khirodhpur, P.S. Fatuha, District Patna, 803201. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar through the chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna Secretariat, Patna 800015.

2. The Collector, District Vaishali, Hajipur

3. The Additional District Collector, Vaishali, Hajipur.

4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, District Vaishali, Hajipur.

5. The Circle Officer, Raghopur, District Vaishali. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Himanshu Kumar Akela, AC to PAAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-04-2017 In view of the averments made in Paragraphs 4 of the counter affidavit indicating that all the Jamabandies on Government land created, which are subject matter of challenge in this Public Interest Litigation have been cancelled, as is evident from orders passed by the competent officer vide Annexure-B, series to the counter affidavit, now no further indulgence into the matter is called for as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. However, if any person is aggrieved by the action taken by the order dated 05.04.2016 (Annexure-A series) as per the statute, the aggrieved person will have liberty to challenge the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8764 of 2016 (4) dt.17-04-2017 2/2 same and the disposal of this matter shall not come in the way of the aggrieved person to ventilate his grievance as per the statutory rights available.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) P.K.P.

U