Deepak Kumar Sinha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48188 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2018 Thana -NABINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Deepak Kumar Sinha, S/o Dadan Lal
2. Dadan Lal @ Dadan Prasad Sinha, S/o Late Raghubar Lal
3. Akhileshwar Prasad Sinha @ Prem Lal @ Akhileshwar Prasad S/o Late Raghubar Lal
4. Pramod Lal, S/o Late Raghubar Lal All Four R/o Village Mahuawn, P.S. Badam OP, District Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Kr.Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition.
Heard the parties.
Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Nabinagar P.S.Case No.156 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 506, 504/34 of the I.P.C. Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant causing injury.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. There is case and counter case and the injuries are simple in nature.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48188 of 2018 (2) dt.23-08-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Aurangabad, in Nabinagar P.S. Case No.156 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U