Madan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2244 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2011 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Madan Singh son of late Nathuni Singh

2. Narendra Singh son of late Deolaxman Singh, both are resident of village Bandhu Barwa, P.S. Ramgarhwa, Dist. East Champaran

3. Hari Kishore Ram son of late Kailash Ram, resident of village & P.S.Ramgarhwa, Dist. East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the nature of allegations and the fair antecedents of the Petitioners, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Motihari Town P.S. case No.40 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2244 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2015 2/2 That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.