Sanjit Kumar Yadav @ Sanjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8292 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2020 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sanjit Kumar Yadav @ Sanjit Yadav Son Of Lal Bahadur Yadav R/O VillageHati, P.S.- Sakri, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-01-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding. The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code in which sections 395 and 412 of Indian Penal Code were added later on. The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the unknown miscreants looted the vehicle of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8292 of 2021(2) dt.10-01-2022 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. There is no recovery of any incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. to ascertain his participation in the alleged occurrence.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8292 of 2021(2) dt.10-01-2022 3/3 the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. -5th, Darbhanga in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 155/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T