Patna High CourtCR. WJC/77/2015dismissed

Krishna Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.

2015-09-14Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.77 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- MUZAFFARPUR =========================================================== Krishna Kumar Gupta son of Late Mahavir Prasad Sah, resident of village + Madhaul, Post- Amarakh, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur, Bihar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Home Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Division at Muzaffarpur.

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Division at Muzaffarpur.

6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

8. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (West), Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

9. The Station House Officer (S.H.O.), P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur-cumInvestigating Officer. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anupam Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar- G.P.-8. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner, Krishna Kumar Gupta seeks a direction to be issued to respondent nos. 1 to 5 to conduct the investigation of Maniyari P. S. Case No. 74 of 2013 in a fair and impartial manner.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.77 of 2015 dt.14-09-2015 2/2 The further prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondents to arrest the FIR named accused persons of the aforesaid police case.

3. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the instant writ application is misconceived. The investigation of the case has been completed and a final report has already been submitted to the Court finding the accusation made against the accused persons named in the FIR to be false.

4. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no merit in this case. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T