Patna High CourtCWJC/9512/2016disposed

Sushila Sinha v. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya And ORS

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9512 of 2016 ====================================================== Sushila Sinha W/o Sri Manojeshwar Pd. Sinha R/o - 001, Devendra Lok Apartment, At + P.O. + P.S. - Kankarbagh, Patna, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya through the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

2. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District : - Gaya.

4. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

5. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

8. The Principal Ganga Devi Mahila College, Kankarbagh, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhukar Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GP32 HARISH KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 A cost of Rs.15,000/- is awarded on the Vice Chancellor of the University, which will be payable jointly by the Vice Chancellor and the Registrar to the petitioner from their pocket and not from the University fund. The retiree is of the year 2008. She moved the High Court in June, 2016 and till November, 2017 there is neither instruction nor counter affidavit filed.

The Vice Chancellor is directed to take a decision, pay the rightful dues of the petitioner within a period of three months or else he will be personally liable. This order is passed because of total lack of assistance and failure to take a decision on the

Patna High Court CWJC No.9512 of 2016(5) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 dispute so raised and they have to be punished for their inaction and casual approach to the litigation before the Court. This writ application is disposed off with above observation and direction.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- U