Ramji Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51315 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2026 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ramji Singh S/o Late Yugesh Singh Resident of Village- Bharwar, P.S.- Aurangabad (Muffasil), District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS, 2023') for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 180 of 2026, lodged on 02/05/2026, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against the sole petitioner with allegation that in the night the petitioner in drunken condition entered into the house of the informant and attempted to outrage her modesty.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51315 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no injury report on record. He submits that from the FIR it is apparent that all the sections are bailable except Section 74 of the BNS. Counsel submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. There are two criminal cases pending against the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that criminal antecedents of the petitioner is not clean and there are two criminal cases pending against the petitioner.

6. Considering the fact that there are two similar criminal antecedents against the petitioner, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby refused. However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner within four weeks from today, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered on the same day without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./Anshuman/ U T