Bibodh Yadav @ Bibodh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8305 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== BIBODH YADAV @ BIBODH KUMAR Son of MaheshwarKhirhari Resident of Village - Rampur Alauli, P.S.- Alauli, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chautham P.S. Case no. 218 of 2019 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is stated by the informant that 10-12 accused persons variously armed with lathi, pistol etc, stopped him and forcibly dispossessed him of his motorcycle, mobile phone etc.. They also took away Rs.10,000/ in cash besides other articles.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8305 of 2021(4) dt.19-07-2021 2/2 accused Sattan Mahto made before police. Inspite of being in custody since 4.5.2020, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. parade. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that the petitioner is accused in as many as 14 cases from before.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the petitioner not being put on T.I. parade inspite of being in custody for more than a year, investigation in the case having concluded and no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Chautham P.S. Case no.218 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khagaria.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U T