Ashraf Ansari @ Butta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46735 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2015 Thana -GURUA District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ashraf Ansari @ Butta, Son of Saleem Ansari, resident of VillageKanchanpur, Police Station- Bodh Gaya and District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2018 in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and later on 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. is that three accused persons came and snatched the motorcycle, Rs. 1560/- and a mobile phone from the informant. Later on, one of the co-accused person was arrested and he disclosed the name of the petitioner and motorcycle was also recovered from him.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody since 19.04.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner stating that stolen motorcycle was purchased by the petitioner from the co-accused.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46735 of 2018 (2) dt.18-09-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000, (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghatti, Gaya, in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T