← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8243/2021bail rejected

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-05-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8243 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2020 Thana- BANDEYA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Son of Kail Prajapati @ Satya Narayan Prajapati Resident of Village - Ajan, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

26-05-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bandeya P.S. Case No. 13 of 2020, G.R. No. 479 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants riding on two motorcycles intercepted the informant and on the point of katta, looted cash worth Rs. 2,30,000/-, cheque book, pass-books of customers, mobile phone and other important documents.

Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of petitioner has come during course of investigation on the confessional statement of co-accused Ranvijay Kumar @ Bulletan. It is further submitted that no looted article has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8243 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2021 2/2 recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 02.07.2020. However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail application and submitted that from the aforesaid looted amount, Rs. 17,000/- (seventeen thousand) was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that out of total looted cash, Rupees seventeen thousand has been recovered from the house of petitioner, the bail application of petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T