Lalan Yadav @ Lalan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52776 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2739 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Lalan Yadav @ Lalan Prasad S/o Sukhlal Yadav R/o Village- Bangal Khad, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vyas Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406, 417 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per complaint petition, the complainant purchased a land, bearing Plot no.-458, Khata no.-51, Area 11 katha 14 dhur, and out of that purchased land, he sold 2 katha 7 dhur to a witness namely Mokhtar Miyan. Thereafter, Mokhtar Miyan alienated the purchased land to this petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner along with other person went to complainant and asked for the original sale-deed and promised to return the same within 2 months and thereafter, in presence of witness, required sale deed was given by complainant to petitioner, but when complainant demanded original sale-deed, this petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52776 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 refused to return the same.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that in the entire complaint, nowhere it has been stated as to when and which piece of land has been sold by petitioner and to whom. Moreover, the dispute is purely of civil nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class, Gopalganj / concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 2739 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T