← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1840/2015bail granted

Punni Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-16Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1840 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -389 Year- 2014 Thana -TURKAULIYA District- EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Punni Yadav, Son of Late Mahngu Rai

2. Bhuneshwar Patel, Son of Ram Dular Patel

3. Bhuwar Yadav @ Pannalal Yadav, Son of Mahngu Rai

4. Rambha Devi @ Ramparbha Devi, wife of Punni Yadav All resident of Village - Gamhariya, P.S. - Banjariya, Distt. East Champaran at Motihari.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the statement of the alleged victim recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C., let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Turkaulia (Banjaria) P.S. Case No. 389 of 2014, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1840 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T