Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51706/2022bail rejected

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51706 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2022 Thana- KHARHAGPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Sunil Yadav Son of Singheshwar Yadav, R/o Village- Pashchim Ajimganj, P.S.- Kharagpur, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar No.2, APP.

For the Informant :

Mr. Shakib Ayaz, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 276 of 2022, lodged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 337/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, the allegation of attack on the informant is there in the F.I.R. on pity issues when he was returning after taking medicine from his mother and allegation of assaulting by 3 persons including the petitioner are there. They also tried to cut by virtue of blade, due to which bleeding started.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51706 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury report indicates that injuries have been made from hard and blunt substances. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2022 having clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has made false affidavit before this Court that he has no criminal antecedent. He has produced the photocopy of certified copy, in which the criminal cases are pending against the petitioner. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and making this suppression as well as on merit, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, therefore, his bail application is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T