Reyajuddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9683 of 2016 =========================================================== Reyajuddin .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul, Adv. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. SHAHI- AAG-6 Mr. Mritunjay Kumar , AC to AAG-6 For the Wakf Board : Md. Anis Akhtar, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 25-07-2016 Heard Mr. Ansul, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing on behalf of the State. Heard also Mr. Anis Akhtar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Wakf Board. The basic grievance of the petitioner is that the meeting of the Governing Body of Soghra College, Biharsharif, Nalanda, has not been held for electing Secretary of the Governing Body and, in consequence thereof, the management and functioning of the college stands adversely affected.
Appearing before us, on behalf of respondent Nos.1
Patna High Court CWJC No.9683 of 2016 dt.25-07-2016 2/2 and 4, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, has submitted that respondent No.4 has already fixed 24.08.2016, at 10:00 A.M., as the date for holding the meeting of the Governing Body of the College. In view of the above, no cause for continuing with this writ petition, which has been filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, survives.
We, therefore, close this writ proceeding with direction to the respondents, particularly, respondent No.4 to ensure that the meeting of the Governing Body of the College is held and necessary decisions are taken on the scheduled date and time. Having regard to the nature of facts, which have been pleaded in the writ petition, we give liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 27.07.2016 Transmission Date N.A.