← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1932/2017disposed

Lakshmi Wheat Products Private Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-20Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1932 of 2017 ====================================================== Lakshmi Wheat Products Private Ltd. 2nd Sector, Industrial Area, Harput Alloth, District - Samastipur through its Managing Director Anita Agarwal, W/o Late Arun Kumar Agarwal, Resident of Village- Ujiyarpur, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Ware-House Corporation through its Managing Director, B2, First Floor, Mauryalok Complex, Patna. 2.

The Managing Director, B-2, First Floor, Mauryalok Complex, Patna Bihar State Ware-House Corporation.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 20-05-2019 Heard Mr. Raj Kamal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the Bihar State Ware-House Corporation.

2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.12.2016 whereby his application for registration as Transportation-cum-Handling Agent of the Corporation has been rejected for paucity of necessary documents which were required to be furnished along with the application for such registration.

2/4

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that three documents which is stated to be deficit in the application of the petitioner are (i) the certificate of property, (ii) character certificate of the concerned partner and the (iii) resolution of the company.

4. It has been submitted that in the counter affidavit only, the respondent corporation has annexed the property certificate as well as the character certificate of the concerned persons/organization and if resolution of the company was required, the petitioner ought to have been asked for the same.

5. It is the further case of the petitioner that the check list of the documents, which were required to be provided along with the application for registration, does not contain "resolution of the company". Despite this, if the petitioner would have been asked for the same, he would have provided it within time. With the aforesaid decision of the respondent corporation, the petitioner could not participate in the tender process for selection as

3/4 Transportation-cum-Handling Agent of the Bihar State Ware-House Corporation.

6. An Interlocutory Application No. 1 of 2019 also has been filed for permitting the petitioner to participate in the tender process. However, with the passage of time, the tender process has been completed and Transportationcum-Handling Agent has already been selected.

7. Nonetheless, the petitioner concerned ought to be registered, if it has all the documents which is required for such registration.

8. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the Bihar State Ware-House Corporation however has submitted that the order passed by the Managing Director of Bihar State Ware-House Corporation is an appealable order and the appeal could have been preferred by the petitioner before the Chairman of the Bihar State WareHouse Corporation.

9. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to prefer an appeal against the

4/4 communication dated 29.12.2016, turning down the request of the petitioner for registration of his firm viz. Lakshmi Wheat Products Private Limited for the purposes of selection of the aforesaid firm as Transportation-cumHandling Agent for the Bihar State Ware-House Corporation. On receipt of such appeal, the Chairman of the Corporation shall pass necessary order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks of the receipt of such appeal but definitely before any further tender is advertised for selection of Transportation-cum-Handling Agent.

10. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 22.05.2019 Transmission Date