← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1395/2015disposed

Nagendra Choubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-04Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1395 of 2015 ====================================================== Nagendra Choubey S/o Anirudh Choubey, Resident of village:- Gaushala, P.O- Katihar, P.S- Sahayak Katihar, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar.

2. The Director (Primary Education), Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3. The District Magistrate of Katihar, District- Katihar.

4. The District Programme Officer (Education) , Katihar.

5. The Block Education Officer, Manashai Block, District- Katihar.

6. The Member District Teacher Appointment Appellate, Tribunal Katihar District- Katihar.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Raj Phulhara, Mansahi Block District Katihar. .

8. The Mukhiya Gram Panchyat, Phulhara, Mansahi Block District- Katihar. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2017 At the very outset, learned AC to AAG-4 submits that the present writ petition was filed against the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. However, presently, the State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal is functioning. The Court is of the opinion that instead of keeping the matter further pending, the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of

Patna High Court CWJC No.1395 of 2015 (2) dt.04-02-2017 2/2 with liberty as indicated above.

It is clarified that the period consumed in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 21.01.2015 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U