Md. Parwez @ Parwez v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54098 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Parwez @ Parwez Son of Md. Barik R/O Vill.- Nari, P.s.- Ghanshyampur, Dist.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Gulsana Khatoon Wife of Md. Parwez, D/O Md. Moti R/O Vill.- Akbarpur Bank, P.s.- Biraul, Dist.- Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Thakur Brajesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the Informant :

Mr. Baidya Nath Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Biraul Mahila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is further submitted that the investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing and the petitioner has not been given the benefit of Section 41A of the Cr.P.C.

3. The learned APP for the State submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54098 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 the petitioner carries punishment of less than seven years, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the informant.

4. In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

5. The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the state of Bihar) and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T