Patna High CourtL.P.A/951/2017dfd for non appearance

Radhika Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-30Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.951 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9676 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Radhika Devi d/o Sri Amar Singh, w/o Sri. Devnandan Prasad Yadav resident of Vikash Nagar, Sandalpur Road, P.O. - Mahendru, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna - 800006, at present in service on the post of Panchayat Elementary Teacher at Prathmik Vidyalaya Lilatola, Devdaha, Dhanarua, Patna - 804451.

2. Suman Devi d/o Sri. Raghunandan Chatturvedi resident of village & P.O. - Gorai, P.S. - Karakat, District - Rohtas, at present in service on the post of Panchayat Elementary Teacher at Prathmik Vidyalaya Nadh (Karakat), District - Rohtas- 802214.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (Departmetn of Education) Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna - 800015.

2. The Director, State Council of Education Research and Training, Bihar, Mahendru, Patna - 800006.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna - 800015. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 30-08-2018 Re: I.A. No. 8277 of 2017 None had appeared on behalf of the appellants Yesterday to press the petition for condonation of delay though learned Counsel for the State was present.

Even today there is no change in the situation while learned Counsel for the State is present.

Patna High Court LPA No.951 of 2017 (7) dt.30-08-2018 There is none to press the condonation application, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is held incompetent and is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Archana/Surendra U