← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55588/2024dismissed

Rakesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-17Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55588 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rakesh Sah, son of Medhu Sah 2.

Mukesh Sah, son of Medhu Sah Both are resident of Village- Ram Nagra Ps- Suppi Dist- Sitamarhi 3.

Mamta Devi, wife of Dilip Sah, Resident of Village- Madhopur Ps- Batpatti Dist- Sitamarhi 4.

Sabita Devi, wife of Arjun Sah, Resident of Village- Raghunathpur PsMejarganj Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2024 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Chiraiya (Sikarganj) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 341, 323, 302, 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners killed the sister of the informant for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55588 of 2024(5) dt.17-12-2024 2/2 petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners have clean antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6.Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as the nature of allegation made against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T