Ramadhar Rai @ Ramadhar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7637 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2020 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAMADHAR RAI @ RAMADHAR RAY, aged about 65 years, Male, Son of Late Guptanand Rai Resident of Yaduvanshi Nagar, Nasriganj, P.S.- Danapur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 30(a), 37(B) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 50 liters wine is said to have been recovered from the car in question. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7637 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2021 2/3 allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 50 liters wine is recovered from the car in question. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case as being the owner of the car in question. The said car in question used to run as a Public Carrier. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 2247/20 (arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No. 178/20), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7637 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2021 3/3 furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T