← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61572/2021bail granted

Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-14Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61572 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== CHHOTU KUMAR Son of Late Gauri Sah @ Gauri Shankar Sah Resident of Village- Khadawan Mushahar Toli, P.S.- Banjaria, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. case No.533 of 2021 registered under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 90 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61572 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 2/3 the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 90 liters wine is recovered from the E-rickshaw. The petitioner is not the owner of the E-rickshaw in question. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61572 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 3/3 No.533 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T