Mithilesh Sah @ Mithlesh Sah @ Mithlesh Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50025 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2025 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Mithilesh Sah @ Mithlesh Sah @ Mithlesh Kumar Sah Son of Chandeshwar Sah Resident of village - Semraha, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra 2.
Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Sah Son of Chandeshwar Sah Resident of village - Semraha, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra 3.
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sah Son of Chandeshwar Sah Resident of village - Semraha, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra 4.
Subhash Kumar @ Subhash Sah Son of Chandeshwar Sah Resident of village - Semraha, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aashish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, on 22.04.2025 at about 9:30 AM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant with lathi, rod, etc. due to which he sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched gold chain worth Rs. 50,000/- from the neck of informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50025 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Though there is specific accusation of assault against petitioner no. 2 with iron rod but doctor has found the injury to be simple in nature. There is no allegation of assault against rest of the petitioners. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, simple injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Panapur P. S. Case No. 143 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T